THANK YOU IF YOU JOIN IN 😘😘😘

CLICK TO DOWNLOAD & SHARE THIS SHORT VIDEO

Download the e-book here, click the image:

The video in the ebook is also downloadable and needs to be shared as much as possible.

THANK YOU IF YOU JOIN IN 😘😘😘

CLICK TO DOWNLOAD & SHARE THIS SHORT VIDEO

Download the e-book here, click the image:

The video in the ebook is also downloadable and needs to be shared as much as possible.

In this film, a CIA whistleblower and two top stuntmen describe how the military and intelligence services—assisted by Hollywood and the mass media—deceive, manipulate, and desensitize people to violence and perverse sex. One CIA officer puts it this way:

“When everything the American public believes is false, we will know our disinformation program is complete.”

SAME VIDEO with Dutch Subtitles

SAME VIDEO with Spanish Subtitles

CIA document from 1957

Download de PDF document here: https://dn790002.ca.archive.org/0/items/ciardp8600513r0013437200083/CIA-RDP86-00513R001343720008-3_text.pdf

NASA document from 1988:

Download this NASA document here: https://dn720006.ca.archive.org/0/items/88104main-h-1391/88104main_H-1391_text.pdf

By the rate of Doppler change that those signals come back, we can actually gauge the speed of that aircraft.

Some of the things that I witnessed that were very interesting about radar is that we would be able to track aircraft all the way down to the ground. And I do mean all the way down to the ground at distances of around 100 miles.

And now that I know the calculation of curvature, 100 miles is 6,666 feet of curvature, of drop. That is literally impossible because radar works at microwave frequencies, two to six gigahertz or even higher, anywhere in the microwave spectrum, and it is absolutely reliant on it being line of sight. Meaning, if you can’t see it, it doesn’t work.

When you take into consideration that we’re able to track aircraft from whatever altitude they’re coming in at all the way down to the ground at a target 100 miles away, and knowing that that target should be 6,000 plus feet below the curvature, that kind of eliminates the ball model.

(check the Earth Curvatur Calculator here yourself)

Well, you know, in air traffic control they have two different types of radar. There’s short-range, airport-based radar that goes out to 60 miles. And then for the long flights, high altitude, and off the coast, they use en-route radar and it can go out to 200 miles. So they can detect targets 200 miles away.

So with radar, the point is that it has to be able to have a direct line to the airplane. With regards to the shape of the Earth, I never thought about it as I worked for 24 years. You don’t say, “Wait a minute, I think that target is too low for me to see at that distance.” Nobody ever even thinks about that.

But in reality, now knowing what must be if we live on a ball, the fact is that at even just 180 miles, any airplane below 26,000 feet — if the radar can see it, the Earth is not a ball. Period. End of story.

And does that happen very often? A thousand times plus a day. A thousand times plus a day somebody calls up, somebody comes from offshore.

There’s a whole class of aircraft that are not pressurized. They can’t fly above 11,000 feet or the pilot will pass out. So they operate at and below 10,000 feet, no matter what. No matter what the weather is, they just can’t operate up there. And there are hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of these airplanes still operating all the time.

So they’d be coming in at 6,000, 7,000, or 8,000 feet from somewhere like Bermuda or beyond, say 180 miles from Miami. And I say, “Roger.” And every time they do that, they prove the Earth is flat — and they don’t know it. But it’s absolute undeniable proof.

At 180 miles the number would be 26,000 feet, and at 200 miles about 29,000. A lot of commercial flights are never at 29,000 feet when coming in from 200 miles out. So over and over again.

[END TEXT]

Thnx to: https://t.me/platteaardebelgienederland

They know that if they control your perception of reality through information, they control your actions. If they determine what you believe, they influence what you create, what you accept, and how you interpret your experience of life on Earth. That is why they call themselves a government. They govern the mental body. They govern the mind. They govern perception.

They are always trying to win perception. It is a game of perception.

Through media, narratives, and carefully constructed messaging, they shape how reality appears to you. When perception is manipulated, behavior follows. When belief is manipulated, identity is formed.

They rely on ignorance. They rely on people being unaware of their own nature and power. The less aware you are of yourself, the easier you are to control.

The deeper truth is that we do not need external, human-made authority to govern our inner world. We are the governors of our own reality. When you reclaim your perception, you reclaim your power.

Do not blindly accept propaganda. Question what you are told. Become aware of how information influences your thoughts. The real battlefield is not physical — it is psychological. And the victory they seek is control over perception.

Govern yourself. Stay aware.”

This guy of “Exposing Things” did a great job with this doc! Subscribe to his YouTube channel.

Spanning 131 pages, this in-depth publication explores a subject that continues to generate debate and unanswered questions worldwide. Within its pages, you’ll find direct links to carefully selected videos, documented patent references, and curated sources designed to help you examine the material independently.

Rather than presenting conclusions, SICKENING SKIES encourages critical thinking. It connects information, highlights documented evidence, and provides readers with the tools to conduct their own deeper exploration.

If you value research, source material, and the opportunity to look beyond surface narratives, this eBook offers a structured and accessible starting point.

Explore the information. Follow the evidence. Draw your own conclusions.

DOWNLOAD E-BOOK "SICKENING SKIES"

🙄🤔😶 They’ve gone crazy.

Want to know more about:
Geo-engineering, H.A.A.R.P & the Climate
✈️ 📡 🌫️ ♻️🔋
https://t.me/GeoChem

05.01.2026 | www.kla.tv/39953

Now, I and most of our team are laypeople in the medical field and when we see these studies we usually don’t understand a lot. That is why we invited a courageous doctor to join us today who has conducted and published studies herself and has a gift for explaining complex medical examinations in simple terms. Let’s get started, we’ll go straight into her bio and are excited to hear what she has to tell us!


Dr. Ute Krüger is a medical specialist for pathology and has 25 years of professional experience. Pathology is the study of sicknesses, especially of its existence and the induced organically anatomic transformations.
[•] 1990 she studied medicine at the Humboldt university in Berlin and received her authorisation to work as a doctor in 1997.
[•] In the same year she submitted her doctoral thesis and defended it. In it she analysed almost 7,500 obduction protocols in order to investigate the clinical diagnoses and those presented at obduction if they were congruent.
[•] 2004 she was successful in the specialist examinations in pathology and cytology.
[•] From 2005 to 2014 she worked as senior physician in the central hospital in Växjö, Sweden where she also worked as medical director from 2010 to 2014.
[•] From 2015 to 2023 she was senior physician in the Clinical Pathology Hospital Kalmar. Parallel to this she did research on breast cancer at the university in Lund as senior physician.
[•] After many further educational trainings she worked in her own holistic practice from 2024 to 2025.
[•] Since the autumn of 2025 she is active full-time in the science association Active Health Institute that she founded and mostly deals with preventing diseases.
During Covid, a collaboration between her and Prof. Dr. Arne Burckhardt developed. Through tissue examinations, Prof. Dr. Burkhardt and his team could prove that there was a connection between the mRNA Covid vaccination and death cases. The dramatic results of the examinations were congruent to her own findings. They met regularly and last in January 2023 on symposiums and congresses to warn the public of the dangers of mRNA vaccines. Only a few months later, on May 30, 2023, the renowned pathologist Prof. Arne Burkhardt died in a tragic accident.


[Excerpt from Kla.TV program:] „I was shocked and wrote into the book of condolence that I will take every effort so these findings will reach the public. One year I was occupied to put together the findings and to bring it into the form of a book. [...] It was very important to him that these findings are published.“


Dr. Ute Krüger has put together the scientific documentation „Vaccinated – Died“ which was published in August 2024. Until now, it is the only histology-Atlas on this topic worldwide. This book contains the findings of Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhard’s tissue examinations and other countless own microscope findings. Dr. Krüger coined the term „turbo cancer“ and makes new alarming insights public.


Thank you for taking so much engagement to continue the precious work of Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt despite much opposition.
The brave Dr. Ute Krüger is here at 22nd AZK live from Sweden.


[Elias Sasek]
Mrs. Krüger, can you hear me, is the connection good to Sweden?


[Dr. med. Ute Krüger]
The connection sounds great here.


[Elias Sasek]
Great, then good luck to you.


[Dr. med. Ute Krüger]
Thank you very much, Mr. Sasek, for the invitation to be here live at the 22nd AZK Can you see my presentation? Great. I would like to tell you something about turbo cancer and the deaths following these corona injections. And by way of explanation, the main task of a pathologist is to diagnose diseases. This means that the pathologist examines tissue that has been removed, e.g. by a surgeon. And this diagnosis by the pathologist then forms the basis for the patient’s further treatment. As you have already heard, I have been working in pathology for 25 years. Here you can see my last workplace. For the last 18 years, I was primarily involved with breast cancer. So I was a breast cancer expert and made tens of thousands of diagnoses, so I knew about the distribution of patient age, tumor size, and the degree of malignancy, in other words, how fast a tumor grows, in my daily intake.


And since fall 2021, I had the impression that I was receiving more material from younger patients – so between 30 and 55 years old was no longer uncommon – and that the tumors were more aggressive. This means that the tumors grew faster and were therefore larger. Four centimeters was no longer uncommon. And the largest invasive tumor, so one that has grown into the tissue, was 16 cm in size. So, if you imagine that, it’s this big. It’s unbelievable. Next, I noticed that there seemed to be more multifocal tumors. These are tumors that grow in one breast, but in different areas. And then I also noticed that bilateral tumors, so tumor growth in both breasts at the same time, also seemed to be more common. And then in December 2021, I made my first public appearance concerning this at the second pathology conference, which I had joined remotely in Berlin. I asked my colleagues to help me disprove or prove the hypothesis of so-called turbo cancer, as I called these types of tumors. In other words, whether it was related to these COVID-19 injections or not. Unfortunately, my efforts met with little response. Only one Austrian colleague responded, so nothing came of this investigation. I also noticed that recently, after these injections, there have been more recurrences, i.e. cancer relapses. These could be patients who had a tumor 20 years ago and then it was no longer there.


And suddenly, after these corona injections, aggressive tumor growth occurred, and it was not uncommon for patients to die relatively quickly. The attempt to raise public awareness of this issue, including here in Sweden, ended with a debate in the Swedish Medical Journal and then with this report in the Swedish media. This is a Swedish radio station. And in September 2022, this gentleman here, Johan Ahlgren, who is the chairman of the Central Swedish Cancer Center, an oncologist, and a lecturer, spoke of sabotage of the vaccination campaign on my part. Namely, sabotage of vaccinating everyone in the region against COVID-19. And there was no interest whatsoever in further investigating this issue of so-called turbo cancer. At first, it was very difficult to find figures on cancer. However, there are now studies, such as this one, published at the end of September 2025. This is a so-called cohort study. A cohort is a group of individuals who share a common characteristic within a period of time, such as the corona virus injections in this case.


This study comes from South Korea. It examined 8.4 million data sets between 2021 and 2023. And the result? There is a significant correlation between these COVID mRNA injections one year after this so-called vaccination and an increased risk of six different types of cancer. Namely, thyroid, stomach, colon and rectum, lung, breast, and prostate. Now, pathologists are often associated with autopsies. Nowadays, autopsies only make up a small part of a pathologist’s work. But I heard about some strange deaths and asked my boss if I could return to the autopsy room. As a senior physician and training supervisor for assistant physicians, you no longer have the opportunity or time to perform autopsies yourself. But I wanted to perform autopsies again and see what was going on there, what people are dying of. So I published a case study. And maybe you could include this publication on your great Vetopedia website.


Unfortunately, this publication is not available on PubMed, which is basically the Wikipedia for doctors, where all medical publications should appear. But even here there is censorship. This case involves a 61-year-old man who had lymphoma, i.e. a cancer of the lymph glands. He was undergoing chemotherapy and immunosuppressive treatment, which means his immune system was suppressed, and during this time he received two of these corona injections. Within a short period of time, he developed Guillain-Barré syndrome, which causes paralysis throughout the entire body, and he died three months after the second injection. He had severe inflammation of the nerves, inflammation of the vessels in the brain, and also a stroke in the medulla oblongata. This is the brain’s control center for many vital functions and was also the cause of death. And these 3 monkeys seem to me to be somehow relevant to this topic (n.o.T.: monkeys „see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing“). I asked a senior physician in the last clinic where I worked how you can vaccinate people undergoing immunosuppressive therapy – that goes against everything we learned at the university.


Because according to conventional wisdom, you need the immune system to elicit an immune response. And the answer I received from him was that we should follow the recommendations of the Ministry of Health. So then I asked him: “Can’t we think for ourselves?” And then I got the literal answer: “They do that for us.” At first I thought this was a joke, but it wasn’t. And I think that’s how many doctors think. You don’t need to think for yourself anymore, you let yourself be controlled. And then, after that conversation, I realized I couldn’t be part of this healthcare system anymore. Especially since my work then seemed completely pointless to me, diagnosing some tumors that another colleague had probably caused with an injection. So I resigned in the fall of 2023.


And since 2021, I had been collaborating with other pathologists, including Professor Arne Burkhardt, who is a very experienced pathologist and had his institute in Reutlingen. I think many people know him. Together with Professor Walter Lang, he examined 89 deaths related to these coronavirus injections. And in most of the cases, the two pathologists were able to prove a connection. In January 2023, I was with Arne at a large conference in Stockholm, which was attended by more than 1,000 people from all over the world. We both gave presentations there and talked about how important it is for his findings to be made public. So I was really shocked by his death in May, after his death. I then asked Professor Lang if he could possibly write this book himself, because he had investigated these cases together with Professor Burkhardt. And then he said, “I’m 83, I can’t write a book anymore now.” So I said, “Okay, I’ll take care of this – I’ll take over,” and I re-examined more than 60 autopsy cases. I went to Reutlingen, sat at Professor Arne Burkhardt’s microscope, which was also very moving, and then selected sections that were suitable for this book. I digitalized them, took photos of them, described them, and compiled this atlas. It is a memorial to Professor Dr. Arne Burkhardt and it is primarily aimed at pathologists, but also at physicians from other disciplines and, of course, for non-physicians interested in health.


This book was published in August 2024 and is already a bestseller. I would like to show you the structure of the book. In the first part, you can see the impressive histological images. I can imagine that it is difficult for laypeople to see anything here, but that is why I have included arrows and circles. I have then described these in the text below so that you can understand what is supposed to be seen here. These images are intended to sensitize colleagues working in routine pathology and forensic medicine to these completely new findings that occur after these mRNA injections. The second part contains the corresponding case descriptions, which show the tragic circumstances and the manifold suffering of these people after the injections. I have structured this so that I include a summary in the first lines at the beginning. Here you can see this: 59-year-old male, three doses of Comirnaty, 417, 380, and 242. These are the number of days after the respective injections until he died. Following this comes a so-called vaccination history – the anamnesis, i.e., which injections were administered and their batch numbers. Here it may also be important to note that none of those who had a digital vaccination certificate had any information about the batch number. This means that nothing can be traced in the digital vaccination certificates.


Then comes a medical history; first of all the autopsy results. The primary autopsy was performed in forensic medicine and pathology departments at other institutes. Professor Burkhardt and Professor Lang only re-examined the cases. In other words, the two pathologists did not perform the autopsies themselves. And then there is the secondary pathohistological examination. That is the work of the two pathologists. And I’ve done it like this: I’ve summarized that here. And here, for example, it says that the cause of death was almost certainly induced by these injections. Now, I would like to show you what the most common findings were. These were reoccurring findings. In about 50 percent of cases, we saw myocarditis, i.e., inflammation of the heart muscle. In almost 90 percent of cases, so in other words a very large number, we saw vasculitis, an inflammation of the blood vessels. This was sometimes associated with thrombus formation [explanation: blood clots] and/or bleeding. We were then able to see the thrombi. On the one hand, typical thrombi, but also atypical thrombi. You may have seen these atypical thrombi, these clots on the internet. There were many videos of undertakers showing these long, white thrombi. So these clots, they really do exist. This is not a fake.


And next, the term “lymphocyte amok.” This term was coined by Arne Burkhardt. We have also adopted it. He wanted to show that the lymphocytes, the inflammatory cells, are running amok in the body. And this in the sense of a so-called autoimmune reaction – so in many organs these inflammatory infiltrates were present. Furthermore, we could see material of unclear origin. This was material that we had never seen before and to an extent that really shocked us, we were very shocked by what we found. It cannot be material that was in the fluids that were injected, but must be something that was formed in the body. In some cases, there was so much of it that it could not have come from the injections alone. We also found that there were amyloid deposits. Amyloid is a defective protein that is deposited in the body. It cannot be broken down and can therefore be seen in the vessel walls. The vessel walls become thick and close up. It can also be found in the heart, for example, and then at some point the heart no longer beats properly. The next point is the loss of elastic fibers.


On the one hand, this occurs in the vessels, and when the vessels lose their elastic fibers, they are no longer elastic, which means they tear. Then on the other hand, it also occurs in the skin. You may have noticed that some people age extremely quickly after these injections, developing lots of wrinkles on their faces, and this is related to the loss of elastic fibers. And then, of course, what I already mentioned before: the so-called turbo cancer, which is not mentioned in the book because patients who die of cancer are hardly ever autopsied anymore. But I would like to show you one case from this book. It is the very tragic case of a 16-year-old girl who died 26 days after her second injection. The reason for these injections was that she wanted to go on her class trip, her school trip, and had an argument with her mother about this. Her mother said, “Don’t take that injection, it’s not good for you.” Her mother worked in the healthcare branch herself, but she could understand her daughter’s feelings. Imagine being 16 years old and isolated. That’s a no-go. And then her mother said, “Okay, fine, then go ahead and do it.” And the girl felt unwell after the second injection and then collapsed at the dinner table on the eighth day after this injection. She was resuscitated by her mother, who is a nurse. However, she died 26 days after this second injection.


And what you can see here is this lighter area. I think you can see it also, the area marked with an asterisks. That is dead heart muscle tissue. And if you look at the magnification, you can see these dark spots here. These are lymphocytes, or inflammatory cells. Then you can see remnants of the heart muscle cells here, these ones. But they have already died here too. And in the upper area, only loose scar tissue can be seen. There are no heart muscle cells left here at all. This means that the heart can no longer function. So this is an example, an image of acute myocarditis [myocarditis = inflammation of the heart muscle], but already in the process of healing here. The heart looked like this in numerous places, and that is no longer compatible with life.


Since the end of August this year (2025), the book has also been available in English and Swedish. I have also sent the English version to Mr. Kennedy and hope that it will be well received there. It is currently the only work of its kind worldwide and can also be seen as a historical document. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to everyone who has supported me financially over the past few years and helped to ensure that this book could be translated into several languages – French and Spanish are still to follow. You can find more information, including details of current lectures, here on this website www.histo-atlas.com – I will be traveling in Switzerland as of November 18th (2025), but you can also find numerous interviews there. I would like to summarize for you a few facts about COVID-19 and the so-called vaccine. Initially, it was stated that the mortality rate, i.e., the probability of dying from COVID-19, was 4 percent. However, it now turns out that the mortality rate is actually 0.1 percent, which is very low and even lower than that of influenza, i.e. the flu, the common flu.


And this name “vaccine,” so this vaccine has not deserved this name. It is clear that this drug neither protects against COVID-19 nor against infection. And in June of 2024, a study was published showing that serious side effects occurred in 11 percent of Pfizer recipients and 21 percent of Moderna recipients. That means serious side effects that cause problems for patients – people who had now become patients – possibly for the rest of their lives – or even causing death. And if you look at the mortality rate of 0.1 percent and the severe side effects in 11 and 21 percent of cases, respectively, then this is no longer proportional. And you are certainly also aware of the RKI protocols, i.e. the protocols of the Robert Koch Institute, the crisis management team there. These are 4,000 pages that were released last year. And here you can read everything that has been published about Corona and the so-called vaccination – everything, including email correspondence. And here it becomes very clear that the Robert Koch Institute, with the scientists there, said: Corona is not that dangerous. We don’t need a lockdown. We don’t need a vaccination campaign. And the pandemic of the unvaccinated, as it was called, is not scientifically correct.


The federal Minister of Health however, ordered a lock-down, and they started a witch-hunt against the unvaccinated. The problem with this though is, that Robert Koch Institute, as a government agency, is bound by instructions. This means that politics rules over science. And that’s something I just can’t deal with. I can’t believe this! It’s also important to know that the manufacturers of these coronavirus vaccines have a liability disclaimer. This means that if you experience side effects after receiving these injections, they are not liable. Yes. So my path led me away from pathology [pathology = the study of human diseases] and from this healthcare system. As you can imagine, I couldn’t stay there any longer and, after several years of further training, I started working in my private medical practice, focusing mainly on healthcare and prevention. And as of this year, as you have already heard, I have been working for the non-profit scientific association “Active Health Institute,” which I also founded. This association deals with holistic health care. It is a matter close to my heart to support people in not becoming ill, or rather to help activate the body’s self-healing powers. And on this website, you can read a lot about the association, www.active-health.se There is also a German page and an English page. So you can view it in different languages. And here you can also see how you can support my work and the association. Perhaps you would like to become a supporting member or support the association with a donation. For example, for the translation of the books into French and Spanish. Because that is the next step. Thank you so much for your attention.


[Elias Sasek]
Thank you so much for these interesting explanations and your important work. Thank you very much, this is very valuable. You have published the following important sentence on your website, I quote: “If such results can be documented in other fatalities in temporal connection with the Covid vaccination, one could speak of one of the greatest medical disasters of all times.” Do you personally already have a final opinion on this? Is a second histopathological atlas needed before the evidence is conclusive, or do you think we can already speak of the greatest medical disaster of all times?


[Dr. med. Ute Krüger]
I think the problem is that the statistics are not being published. So, it is definitely important that numerous cases are still documented worldwide and that the statistics are also published to show how many people have died or suffered damage after receiving these injections.


[Elias Sasek]
Thank you for this assessment. Yes, as shown before your speech, 64,000 vaccine injured victims already spoken out on Vetopedia. Is it worth, in your opinion, to continue with this, or is this like old news already? Based on the victims who have already come forward, is it worth continuing?


[Dr. med. Ute Krüger]
Well, in my opinion, it is important that as many people as possible speak up. The more injured people come forward, the more people who still believe in the effectiveness and safety of these Covid-19 shots will understand the great suffering that has befallen people. And besides, the topic of mod-RNA vaccination is still highly topical. Because, on the one hand, the campaigns for these coronavirus vaccines are starting up again and on the other hand, this mod-RNA technology is to be used in other vaccines, such as childhood vaccines. And that’s why it’s important to keep going.

[Elias Sasek]
Thank you, thank you so much. Then we’ll close the line at this point, have a great evening still.

from -

Sources/Links:
https://www.kla.tv/39682

We saw this clearly during the “plan-demic.” 💉 Some people are so dependent on the system that they will fight to defend it, even when it harms them. And some were never meant to be unplugged. ⛓️

So stay strong. Find your tribe. Let go of people who pull you down instead of lifting you up.

The times are changing. We are living in times of revelation and truth — where darkness, deep and malicious darkness, is coming to light.

And in this process, we must have faith. In each other. In ourselves. In our truth. In our soul and our voice.

Learn more about:
Geo-engineering, H.A.A.R.P & the Climate
✈️ 📡 🌫️ ♻️🔋
https://t.me/GeoChem

[VIDEO TEXT]

You are getting a practical example of what a contrail is and what a chemtrail is right in front of your eyes. You see the two small ones there — regular airplanes, exactly how it’s supposed to look. Then you have this. The mega-streak. And they are laying the foundation for what the world will be like tomorrow, which, quite amusingly, is cloudy — there is no sun — and they have completely blocked it out.

“But aren’t they flying at different altitudes?” No. It doesn’t look that way regardless. Remember this — it’s us who accept it and allow it to be like this. Or not.

What do you want? What kind of future do you want? What kind of future do you want for yourself and your children? So never forget that this up there is the source of our life. And if you start messing with it, you’re in serious trouble.

14.11.2025 | www.kla.tv/39427

January 2025: Forest fires rage in Southern California.
And the result of this study is that climate change has increased the risk of devastating forest fires. The hot, dry and windy conditions that have led to the massive size of the fires are 35 percent attributable to man-made climate change.

January 23, 2025: Storm Eowyn rages over Ireland.
There are plausible links between extreme storms like today and climate change and we will see more severe storms due to warming.

May 28, 2025: The Swiss mountain village of Blatten is largely destroyed by an avalanche of debris and ice.
Professor Michael Krautblatter heads the Chair of Landslide Research at the Technical University of Munich. He suspects that the event in Valais is linked to climate change.

Gigantic floods in Texas in the beginning of July 2025.
Was climate change to blame? Climate change is making tropical storms more dangerous not only in this way. It is to be expected that more extreme, potentially deadly storms will become more frequent as a result of climate change.

July 27, 2025: Greece and Turkey battle record heat and forest fires.
Climate change as a fire accelerator.

Scientists see climate change as the decisive factor behind the increasingly extreme conditions. These were just a few examples of how the system media reported on natural disasters this year. Did you recognize the common thread? The scapegoat for these disasters is always climate change allegedly caused by CO₂. The ZDF broadcasting corporation defines the cause of this climate change on its website as follows. Climate change is progressing. It will be mitigated if we emit less CO₂ and other greenhouse gases. However, this absolute statement by the ZDF and other media that climate change is only caused by greenhouse gases is shaken to its foundations if, in addition to the so-called mainstream, free, alternative information platforms are also allowed to have their say as dissenting voices. Here are two examples. First.

The kla.tv documentary “Climate Consensus Under the Microscope” refutes the claim that 97% of scientists agree that climate change is caused by CO₂. This is scientific fraud with cheap sleight of hand tricks. Secondly. The kla.tv documentary “Updates for Greta” uses facts and figures to prove that completely different causes are responsible for climate change. In numerous other documentaries, kla.tv has broadcast rebuttals to the CO₂ thesis.

Well-founded expert presentations, which are withheld from viewers of ARD, ZDF etc., also show other possible causes of climate change. The following three facts should make any objective observer suspicious of this controversial CO₂ theory.

Fact 1: Composition of air The volume percentage of CO2 in the air is 0.04%
Fact 2: The proportion of CO2 in the air that humans can actually influence is around 4% This means that humans can only influence 4% of the 0.04% CO2 content of the air, which is approx. 0.0016% of the total amount of air! This is approx. 0.0016% of the total air volume. Fact 3: Germany’s share of global CO₂ emissions is a maximum of 2%.

This means that Germany’s citizens only influence approx. 0.000032% of the total amount of air via CO₂. Can the sixth digit after the decimal point really save the climate? Who can still fully understand the CO₂ climate issue based on these figures? Especially as billions are pumped into carbon offsetting projects every year?

However, as the above examples from the year 2025 show, ARD, ZDF and Co. continue to sell the CO₂ theory as fact to their millions of viewers despite all the evidence to the contrary. What is important in this context is that there are publicly accessible documents that prove that the military in particular can actually influence the climate on a large scale with weather weapon systems. Evidence for the existence of climate-altering weapon systems

1. The European Parliament
The European Parliament confirms in a report dated January 14, 1999 entitled HAARP – A climate-damaging weapon system. The existence of dangerous weather weapons. Here are brief excerpts from this highly explosive report. HAARP can be used for many purposes. By manipulating the electrical properties in the atmosphere, enormous forces can be controlled. If this is used as a military weapon, the consequences can be disastrous for the enemy. HAARP can charge a clearly defined area with millions of times more energy than any other conventional energy. HAARP can cause changes in climatic conditions. The system can also affect the entire ecosystem. Another serious consequence of HAARP is the holes in the ionosphere caused by the strong waves directed upwards.

2. The UN-NMOD Convention
Known as the United Nations Convention on Environmental Warfare. Here is an excerpt from the UN NMOD Convention from 1976, which illustrates the possibilities that can be caused by the use of environmental manipulation techniques. Earthquakes, tidal waves, disruption of the ecological balance of a region, changes in weather structures, clouds, precipitation, hurricanes of various kinds and tornadoes, changes in climate structures, changes in ocean currents, changes in the state of the ozone layer, and changes in the state of the ionosphere.

3. Former US Secretary of Defense Dr. William Cohen
Cohen confirmed the existence of these climate-altering weapons on April 28, 1997 at a conference on terrorism in Athens. Others even engage in a kind of eco-terrorism, changing the climate, creating earthquakes and, opening volcanoes through the use of electromagnetic waves. It is real, and that is why we need to intensify our counter-terrorism efforts.

4. Numerous patents confirm the existence of climate weapons
There are hundreds of US weather patents for weather manipulation technologies. Numerous patents, for example US patent 4.412.654, confirm that highly toxic substances, such as aluminum, barium or lead, can be sprayed as fine dust by aircraft and thus have a massive impact on the weather. Should all of these very expensive US patents really only have been applied for but never be used? Hardly, because 110 weather manipulation programs were approved by the US Senate between 1947 and 1978. A US Air Force document from 1996 clearly states the goal. We will own the weather by 2025. These documents prove beyond doubt that secret military weapons have been in existence for decades that can trigger storms, severe weather, but also extreme drought and demonstrably change our climate.

Specifically, the HAARP antenna systems already mentioned are one of the issues here. Such facilities have been in place for decades in a number of countries, as the world map shows. The USA in particular has also demonstrably manipulated the climate and weather with one of its largest plants in Alaska, which has required vast amounts of energy to operate since the 1990s. In order to use these weapons even more effectively, some of them also require the spraying of highly toxic substances by aircraft. The fact that this actually happens and is by no means a conspiracy theory is confirmed by none other than former FBI chief Ted Gunderson shortly before his death. The American educational pioneer, Dr. Anthony Hilder, reported with reference to medical evidence that Gunderson did not die of natural causes, but was poisoned. The documents cited by Gunderson and his personal statement shed a new light on the omnipresent climate debate of recent years. And certainly, not every natural disaster has been triggered by weather weapons. However, the following two questions need to be asked urgently with regard to mass media reporting.

1. Why is a CO₂ theory constantly being sold to the population as proven science?
2. Why, on the other hand, are secret military climate weapons, which demonstrably damage our climate, completely ignored or even denied in the climate debate?

The following scenario provides a conclusive explanation for these two extremely explosive questions: High-ranking military officers have always had a great interest in the weather, because the power over the weather can be decisive for war. It was not without reason that former US President Lindon B. Johnson said: “He who controls the weather will control the world”. However, the military was aware from the outset that the use of these secret military weather weapons and the associated spraying of highly toxic metal oxide particles into the atmosphere would inevitably change the climate in the long term. To avoid being exposed as the cause of serious climate change themselves, they have launched the CO₂ thesis by supporting media campaigns. Suddenly there were warnings of a climate horror scenario in which entire cities would sink into the sea and only Cologne Cathedral, for example, would rise out of the sea. At the same time, scientists were presenting the population with the CO₂ scapegoat. From then on, the vital CO₂ was demonized under a scientific guise.

The CO₂ certificate indulgence trade, reminiscent of the sale of indulgences in medieval church history, could begin. As a result, this crime became a very profitable business model. As in a detective story, the real perpetrators of climate change have therefore acted with diabolical calculation from the outset and have laid a false trail. In order to continue experimenting with criminal climate weapons in secret, all climate change had to be blamed on the CO₂ scapegoat. The real climate criminals have always been able to hide in the dark behind a supposedly scientifically proven CO₂ thesis. This means that the CO₂ theory ultimately turns out to be a pure diversionary tactic to protect the actual perpetrators. Under no circumstances was the public allowed to find out what a devious crime was actually being committed. In plain language, however, this also means that the entire sincere climate movement has been instrumentalized and abused for criminal purposes. Sincere people who have campaigned for the protection of the global climate have allowed themselves to be harnessed to their “CO₂ cart”.

Military and commercial objectives were pursued under the charitable pretext of saving the climate and nature by reducing CO₂ emissions. A look behind the curtain of climate criminals The famous saying “Follow the money” is used as advice to analyze money flows in order to uncover motives, backers or corrupt networks.

It fits into the picture that the Rockefeller family, of all people, is a major sponsor of the CO₂-framed climate movement. The Rockefeller family plays a leading role in freemasonry. This secret society as well as the Rockefeller Foundations pretend in public to support charitable goals. But what are their real goals? The common goal of the high-degree freemasons is the establishment of a New World Order with a one-world government - for their benefit and not for the benefit of the world’s population. David Rockefeller outlined the path to achieving this goal as follows: “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All that is needed is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order. These world domination obsessives are thus working with crises on a grand scale to get the world’s population to not only affirm a world dictatorship, but to downright desire it. In addition to terrorist crises such as 9-11, alleged pandemic crises, all possible or real threats of world war, the climate crisis caused by weather weapons must also be counted among the crises of major proportions.”
“In order to be able to stage these crises on a large scale, the actors in the background are dependent on the support of the mass media.” That’s why David Rockefeller said many, many years ago, “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications. whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity.”

For this reason, the role of the mass media must also be clarified in conclusion. The role of the media financed by compulsory levies The example of the climate debate is a very good illustration of the influence of the public media on people’s perceptions. Although the existence of weather weapons has been proven for decades, these weapons are not perceived by the public as existing in any way. Instead, the average citizen concludes that unusual weather phenomena are always directly linked to the increased CO₂ emissions caused by humans and the resulting climate change. After all, this is how it was instilled in them over decades on all channels of the system media. On the other hand, information about military weather weapons was withheld from the public. An emerging public debate about such weapons systems was nipped in the bud by the media and the spraying of toxic substances over the heads of all citizens was relegated to the realm of conspiracy theories. In this way, the media financed by compulsory levies serve a small minority and their interests.

Dear viewers, kla.tv has been warning for years: “Bought mass media, above all the public broadcasters, are among the most dangerous organizations in the world!” They did not uncover the criminal machinations in the climate debate either, but hushed them up and thus became actors. ARD, ZDF, ORF, SRF and Co. have disqualified themselves.

For example, how much longer do we want to allow substances to be sprayed over our homes and gardens and poison our food? The order of the day is therefore for citizens to inform citizens. Take the time now and make this documentary known to your circle of friends. You can also use social media such as WhatsApp, Facebook, TikTok or even X. The displayed short link will help you with the dissemination.

from SVW

Sources/Links:

Forest fires are raging in southern California https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waldbr%C3%A4nde_in_S%C3%BCdkalifornien_im_Januar_2025

https://www.tagesschau.de/wissen/klima/klimawandel-waldbraende-kalifornien-100.html


The storm Éowyn
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmtief_%C3%89owyn

https://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/europa/sturm-eowyn-aufraeumarbeiten-100.html


The Swiss mountain village Blatten
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bergsturz_von_Blatten

https://www.tagesschau.de/wissen/klima/bergrutsch-ursachen-100.html


Huge floods in Texas
https://www.spiegel.de/ausland/texas-sturzflut-mit-vielen-toten-klimawandel-und-politik-im-fokus-a-00686524-5289-42d6-8357-9d8d4fc5ad64


Was climate change to blame
https://www.zeit.de/wissen/2025-07/fluten-texas-ueberschwemmung-naturkatastrophe-warnsystem


Greece and Turkey are fighting record heat and forest fires
https://www.br.de/nachrichten/deutschland-welt/griechenland-und-tuerkei-kaempfen-gegen-rekordhitze-und-waldbraende,Us9cTPb

https://www.tagesschau.de/faktenfinder/kontext/klimawandel-co2-ausstoss-100.html

https://www.swr.de/swrkultur/wissen/schon-wenige-prozente-co2-fuehren-zu-erderwaermung-102.html


Climate change is progressing – weakened by less CO2
https://www.zdfheute.de/politik/klimawandel-deutschland-welt-folgen-daten-100.html


CO2 share in the air
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luft

https://www.verivox.de/gas/themen/co2-ausstoss/


The European Parliament
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1999-0005_DE.html


UN NMOD Convention
https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/3905

https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1988/1888_1888_1888/de


Former US Secretary of Defense Dr. William Cohen
https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/3903


Numerous patents confirm the existence of climate weapons
https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/5510

https://www.chemtrail.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/art1.pdf

https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/5511

https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/5513

https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/5514


https://www.kla.tv/28095

https://www.kla.tv/28593


Former FBI chief Ted Gunderson
https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/5513

https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/5514


Military interest in weather manipulation
https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/5511

https://www.kla.tv/28095


Cologne cathedral under water
https://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/index-1986-33.html


A look behind the climate criminals’ curtain
https://www.kla.tv/37517

https://www.kla.tv/13466


The spraying of highly toxic substances over the heads of all citizens was categorically banned to the realm of conspiracy theories.
https://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/chemtrails-9-11-und-co-wie-man-verschwoerungstheorien-100.html

17 Oct 2023 | www.kla.tv/27238

In October 1958, 65 years ago, the U.S. space agency NASA began its operations. What for some is the flagship of U.S. research is, for others, the production site of a very elaborately made—but not flawless—deception, in other words: fake. It is precisely these flaws that catch the eye of media professionals and are commented on accordingly. This is also the case in the following 20-minute documentary, which is intended to encourage viewers to form their own opinion. Ultimately, it is about nothing less than our entire worldview.

Copyright: https://chnopfloch.ch/datenschutz/

(DOWNLOAD THE VIDEO HERE)

I have a serious question: Are the images that NASA and others present to us as videos from outer space really real? Are they genuine recordings, or perhaps forgeries filmed in a movie studio? Can one recognize indications or evidence of film tricks or even computer-generated virtual reality?

Let’s get to the bottom of these questions:

As a media service provider with professional experience since 2004, I claim: Everything NASA, ESA, and all the other space agencies show us is studio footage, green screen, and CGI—computer-generated imagery—in modern terms: fake!

This is a claim that will likely meet with strong resistance. However, I think we can agree on one point from the outset. If NASA’s recordings were actually real, we would see nothing but pristine image material. Without errors, without Hollywood tricks, without questionable scenes that make us doubt the laws of physics. Even a single scene that revealed such things would expose NASA and others as liars. But just watch for yourselves and form your own judgment.

In this episode we focus on glitches, CGI, and green screen. I will generally avoid technical jargon as much as possible and explain what is seen as simply as I can so that laypeople can also understand what is going on. Nevertheless, a few things must be mentioned.

Most people are probably familiar with green screen. It is the green background often used for film recordings. Simply put: an actor is filmed in front of a green backdrop, the green is removed in video editing, and the color is replaced with a desired background. This makes one very flexible and not tied to specific locations in terms of scene depiction. Depending on requirements, blue screens are also used—then they are not green but, as the name suggests, blue. By the way, green screen also works in live broadcasts, though sometimes with small pitfalls. CGI stands for Computer Generated Imagery—computer-generated images. Objects that originate, for example, from 3D software and are thus artificially created.

Glitches may need a bit more explanation: they are malfunctions or calculation errors in a computer program—in our case, graphical errors. The software is supposed to calculate a virtual image scene containing an actor, some real objects, artificially generated 3D objects, and an artificial background. At a certain point—whatever the reason—a calculation error occurs; perhaps the processor is overloaded. The affected area is not rendered cleanly and strange artifacts, image jumps, distortions, or similar effects appear.

Glitches are therefore quite clear evidence of computer manipulation. The question now is: do such things exist in NASA footage? And the answer is unequivocally YES! Absolutely!

Let’s start with this gem from September 9, 2022: a live broadcast in which Kamala Harris supposedly spoke directly with the ISS. Look closely! Well? What do you notice? Here it is again. Still nothing? Let’s go into detail, zoom in and slow down the footage:

The microphone cable begins to move wildly. The astronaut tries to bat it away and in doing so creates a beautiful glitch. Apparently, during the fast hand movement, the 3D software can no longer decide whether the cable should be displayed over or under the hand, and so it virtually merges with it, or passes straight through the hand. We therefore see that the cable is a generated 3D object, because there is no other way to explain this scene.

The image-rendering software fails to handle the so-called collision detection. In other words, it cannot accurately track which image element should collide with which and thus cause repulsion. As a result, the hand suddenly becomes a permeable, non-colliding object. I hope that was at least somewhat understandable.

Also nice to look at is the phantom microphone a little further back in the film. Now it’s there! Now it’s gone! Back again! Gone again! And back again! Yes, the image calculation really went wrong there. The microphone clearly also originates from 3D software and was completely miscalculated into the scene.

They cannot be camera errors, because cameras simply record flatly whatever comes in front of the lens. Nor can the transmission be at fault, because it could not possibly exclude only the microphone head or cable, but would affect the entire image or large parts of it.

Some background on computer-generated 3D objects such as this microphone: such objects are created in several—let’s say—layers. First the basic shape or wireframe model, then color and texture layers are added, and finally lighting effects give the finishing touch, explained very simply and without much jargon. The final creation of these objects is called rendering. During rendering, all layers are combined into a finished clip. If rendering is done live, this can of course lead to problems—for example because the computer cannot generate the desired result quickly enough or the processor is overloaded. This is particularly problematic when 3D objects are supposed to interact live with actors. And that is exactly what we are talking about here.

In the following examples you can clearly see that we are indeed dealing with computer graphics that are inserted live:

1. This microphone. First it glitches, then the light reflections that were previously present suddenly disappear—from one frame to the next.

2. The astronaut actor Don Pettit demonstrates how to drink coffee in space. It looks quite good so far, apart from the image quality. The end of the clip is decisive, because—oops—the coffee suddenly separates from the container and jumps out of it without losing its shape. The color layer clearly detaches from the shape layer, which is only possible if the object originates from 3D software and the live rendering went wrong. A textbook miscalculation and thus the next proof that NASA creates its footage using virtual reality.

3. The same applies in the third example: out of nowhere, a plush figure appears, with which one can even interact live. At first I thought the object might have been hidden behind a so-called mask, but for a few frames you can see the actress’s hand shining through it. So the object was overlaid, not revealed from a mask, which rules out the other possibility.

Interacting with virtual objects is explained by the so-called ragdoll engine, which is common in video games. Feel free to research it; I won’t go into more detail here. Motion control would also be an interesting search term to complement the topic.

And since we’re already on the subject of “virtual reality,” take a look at this. Pay attention to the guy on the left of the image and what he does next. And here we go. Yes, this goes back and forth, but that’s how it becomes really clear. Watch his hands. He takes an imaginary object in his left hand, passes it to his right, and puts it aside. Too bad that the object he wants to get rid of is not visible.

Technical explanation: the channel on which the live-inserted 3D object was supposed to be shown was not active in the broadcast. Apparently it was active in the preview, though—just look at his eyes. He is not looking at the object, but straight ahead, as if checking on a monitor that his action looks good and correct. “Caught,” I would say. Possibly the actors even use contact lenses for direct preview projection onto the retina. Yes, such things really exist!

We also see that entire scenes are artificially spliced together, such as the astronaut actor on the right of the image. A brief image glitch reveals that he was cut out and rotated into the scene. We see a very straight-cut graphical error with parallel lines that match the man’s angle of tilt. So to speak, cut out as a block, rotated 190 degrees, and inserted at the top right. The lighting on the man’s face also does not match the woman’s lighting and suggests a separate recording. The light is harsher, more direct, and creates more contrast. As a former photographer, I see two different lighting setups and thus two different recordings that were merged.

This one is also brilliant. No glitch, but a nice editing error. And we see—again at 15% speed—how he dissolves into thin air like a ghost, including environmental errors on the left side where some objects slip upward. A so-called soft dissolve was used here, blending the transition between two scenes. Unfortunately, such dissolves have no place in supposedly uncut videos where they simply must not occur.

Another nice and, well, embarrassing example of compositing: we see “magicians” aboard the ISS who simply appear out of nowhere via an insert sequence. David Copperfield would turn green with envy.

Here is a layering error. In the background, on this white rectangle, you can see a shadow. Now watch closely what happens to the head of the performer in the back. The computer calculates part of the shadow as a layer in front of the astronaut actor, which is why his head is initially partially obscured by it, like by a door lintel. Then his head moves through the shadow layer, which puts the software into a logic problem. The bald head first merges with the shadow and then melts through it. A clear CGI calculation error.

In the next shot, the so-called tracking—object tracking—goes badly wrong. The fingers of the right hand are on the microphone. Now this hand is pulled away, and without any corrective movement, but with nasty graphic glitches, the fingers of the left hand are suddenly on the microphone. It gets really funny when the hand is moved back. The fingers literally glide under the left hand without any resistance whatsoever, which is physically impossible. At the same time, you can clearly see the computer’s effort to produce a clean image. The cut edges around the fingers are clearly visible as dark outlines, and even chewed-off fingertips can be seen. No, dear NASA fans, these are not transmission errors.

One more example, and I think I don’t need to comment on this image jump—it speaks for itself. Again a rendered 3D object with a life of its own. And if you let the scene run, it glitches continuously. No idea what was going on there, but it looks as if the graphics process for the live image calculation overheated a bit.

But let’s move on to another important point for exposing NASA’s falsified footage: the green screen. Right at the start, my favorite shot. The video officially comes from NASA’s channel. Title and links are displayed, so feel free to check.

Once again, the end of the recording is interesting. All three astronaut actors blur simultaneously into a single graphic mush, while the background remains intact. Again. And this time, focus on the foreground objects, because they too are affected by the graphic glitch. But the most interesting are these green areas. Through the glitch in the foreground layer, we get a direct glimpse of the true background behind the actors they call astronauts. And that is the green screen. For some reason, the masking of the green area remained intact while the image material disintegrated—without affecting the inserted background.

The explanation “film error” or “transmission problem” is technically impossible. First, the entire image would be affected, not just this highly selective section. Second, cameras do not generate arbitrary colors. They cannot create green where there is no green. And transmission errors only destroy existing image material; they do not create colors out of nothing.

This is how it works in film. This clip demonstrates very impressively how entire fictional worlds can be created simply with a green screen. In film, we take this for granted. But as soon as one accuses NASA of falsifying images with this technique, most people consider it absurd. Why, actually? Why don’t we want to acknowledge what is obvious as soon as it contradicts our worldview? Are illusions more important to us, so that we simply don’t want to see anything? Be that as it may. Green screen is completely standard practice in video production today. A few objects are real, the rest is composited—such as here during the filming of “The Hobbit,” or in many other films. Or even at NASA itself, as can be clearly—and probably unintentionally—seen here in a report. Ask yourselves why one would need a green screen behind the ISS if all space footage is supposed to be real.

Meanwhile, the technology is getting better and better, and green screens are being used less and less. Modern productions use LED walls that react live to camera movement with the help of video game engines, thus appearing much more realistic and enabling optimal lighting. Another advantage: the actors themselves see the background during filming—and all of this works live and in real time. By the way, today almost everything can be generated in real time. The video game “Hellblade” is an incredible example. The acting is rendered in real time and displayed again within milliseconds. Shots can be seamlessly merged so that, as here, the actor can enter into dialogue with himself.

We are therefore heading toward times when clear evidence of forgery through careless or unintended green-screen errors will no longer occur. This makes it all the more important to understand now that we are being coldly lied to by NASA & Co. I have one more example on this point. George Bush Sr. visited NASA—and what do we see in the background? The so-called astronaut Tim Peake, who was supposedly at the same time in Earth orbit, and who is handling a green sphere in front of a blue grid background. At the edges, the scene is framed by equipment that is always seen in the wonderful ISS live broadcasts. By the way, green objects are also used in film to provide reference points for actors when other 3D objects are to be added later. And as for the background—you can ask yourselves.

Later, an excuse was attempted for the background, selling it as an aid for scientific experiments. But look at it soberly: what on earth are these supposed experiments? What practical benefit are they supposed to have?

A few concluding examples: Apart from the image processor apparently wanting to cool down again and glitching like crazy, we also see here the telltale shining through of the green screen—right now. And in the next shot, the video software briefly fails to correctly key out the green background. Additionally, a great example that the floating objects—and even the clothing of the astro-actors—are 3D-generated. Take a close look at the cable: if that’s not a clear calculation error, then what is? As for the actor, I suspect that so-called motion-capture suits are used and the appropriate clothing is digitally inserted. I cannot prove this, but it would explain why there are calculation errors on the person at all. As I said, in normal film recordings such things would not occur: the background remains intact, calculated objects turn into pixel mush. They are computer-generated images—nothing else.

This one is also quite funny and actually a bit creepy: half of the actor’s face was made transparent. This happens when the green tolerance in the video program is set too high. Areas are then keyed out that are not green but shift toward green due to, for example, unfavorable shadows. But enough of that for now.

There are many more pieces of evidence for NASA image forgery. But in my opinion, these are among the clearest. I already know how strong the inner resistance in many NASA fans will be, automatically seeking explanations for why I must be wrong and NASA would never lie. To those people I can only say: it is pointless to close your eyes to the obvious. No one is so blind as the one who does not want to see! So look. We are being deceived and lied to! For now, they still make these mistakes; for now, we can still detect them. As explained at the beginning: in real broadcasts, such errors must never occur—not a single one! They prove that forgery is taking place.

And if the question now arises why it even matters whether space agencies lie, I can only say: consider what all depends on NASA & Co.—our entire worldview.

hm

Verse 2
Anyone who still believes in political parties and power
Is engaged in a futile effort, wasting their strength.
Because behind the scenes, silent and cold,
Stands a large group that maintains the world.

Pre-Chorus
They control the code,
Manage the line,
Control the future—
Not you, not me, but they do.

Chorus
They want to break us, to make us slaves,
Thinking devilishly, ruthless, cool, and composed.
They are working to replace us all,
Human out, trapped inside a robot shell.

Verse 3
I dare to predict it won’t take long anymore,
Humans will be replaced, again and again.
Maybe someone will remain to maintain them,
Or they’ll have other robots build those too.

Verse 4
It is the cabal’s wet dream,
A Greater Israel as the ideal.
Ruling the world without a face,
With metal soldiers, cold and compelled.

Chorus
We, with a soul, with spirit and feeling,
Are no longer needed—that is their goal.
We are kept busy, blinded from sight,
While their army awakens in silence.

Bridge
Distraction maneuvers, an endless game,
Everything complicated, but look closely and count.
It’s a smokescreen, it’s strategy,
While they build their machinery.

Verse 5
An army of robots, year after year,
Will flood our countries, fully prepared.
Then the dam breaks—no turning back,
We are pushed aside, harsh and rough.

Chorus (dark)
Ruthlessly discarded, wiped out,
Under hoaxes no one exposes.
Pandemics, diseases deliberately devised,
Vaccines as a mask for the silent force.

Outro
It won’t be noticeable, so cleverly done,
But in fact we are being murdered, from now on.
That’s what they are working on, TODAY,
While you still think: “Oh, it’s not that bad.”

While you still think: “Oh, it’s not that bad.”

While you still think: “Oh, it’s not that bad.”

Patents in the field of weather modification, largely classified under A01G 15/00, relate to technologies designed to alter atmospheric conditions, including cloud seeding, fog dispersal, and hail suppression using chemicals such as silver iodide or urea. These patents often focus on specific techniques, such as generating shock waves to disrupt hail or using polymers to absorb moisture in hurricanes.

Reminder:

The New World Order is waging weather wars against us humans. This is for those who claim that weather modification is merely a conspiracy theory.

Here are all the patents for your conspiracy theory; look them up yourselves now!

(source: geoengineeringwatch.org)

Patents for Weather Modification
PATENT NUMBER – YEAR – PATENT TITLE

0462795 – July 16, 1891 – Method Of Producing Rain-Fall

803180 – October 31, 1905 – Means for Producing High Potential Electrical Discharges

1103490 – August 6, 1913 – Rain-Maker

1225521 – September 4, 1915 – Protecting From Poisonous Gas In Warfare

1279823 – September 24, 1918 – Process and Apparatus for Causing Precipitation by Coalescence of Aqueous Particles Contained in the Atmosphere

1284982 – November 19, 1918 – Process and Apparatus for Procuring and Stimulating Rainfall

1338343 – April 27, 1920 – Process And Apparatus For The Production of Intense Artificial Clouds, Fogs, or Mists

1358084 – November 9, 1920 – Method of Producing Fog-Screens

1619183 – March 1, 1927 – Process of Producing Smoke Clouds From Moving Aircraft

1665267 – April 10, 1928 – Process of Producing Artificial Fogs

1892132 – December 27, 1932 – Atomizing Attachment For Airplane Engine Exhausts

1895765 – January 31, 1933 – Artificial Production of Fog

1928963 – October 3, 1933 – Electrical System And Method

1957075 – May 1, 1934 – Airplane Spray Equipment

1993316 – March 5, 1935 – Apparatus for and Method of Producing Oil Fog

2052626 – September 1, 1936 – Method of Dispelling Fog

2097581 – November 2, 1937 – Electric Stream Generator – Referenced in 3990987

2173756 – September 19, 1939 – Process of Producing Fog or Mist by Partial and Flameless Combustion

2352677 – July 4, 1944 – Artificial Fog Production

2476171 – July 18, 1945 – Smoke Screen Generator

2409201 – October 15, 1946 – Smoke Producing Mixture

2480967 – September 6, 1949 – Aerial Discharge Device

2527230 – October 24, 1950 – Method of Crystal Formation and Precipitation

2527231 – October 24, 1950 – Method of Generating Silver Iodide Smoke

2550324 – April 24, 1951 – Process For Controlling Weather

2582678 – June 15, 1952 – Material Disseminating Apparatus For Airplanes

2611992 – September 30, 1952 – Engine Exhaust Operated Fluent Material Distributor

2614083 – October 14, 1952 – Metal Chloride Screening Smoke Mixture

2633455 – March 31, 1953 – Smoke Generator

2688069 – August 31, 1954 – Steam Generator – Referenced in 3990987

2721495 – October 25, 1955 – Method And Apparatus For Detecting Minute Crystal Forming Particles Suspended in a Gaseous Atmosphere

2730402 – January 10, 1956 – Controllable Dispersal Device

2903188 – April 2, 1956 – Control of Tropical Cyclone Formation

2756097 – July 24, 1956 – Process for Weather Control

2801322 – July 30, 1957 – Decomposition Chamber for Monopropellant Fuel – Referenced in 3990987

2835530 – May 20, 1958 – Process for the Condensation of Atmospheric Humidity and Dissolution of Fog

2871344 – January 27, 1959 – Long Distance Communication System

2881335 – April 7, 1959 – Generation of Electrical Fields

2908442 – October 13, 1959 – Method For Dispersing Natural Atmospheric Fogs And Clouds

2962450 – November 29, 1960 – Fog Dispelling Composition

2963975 – December 13, 1960 – Cloud Seeding Carbon Dioxide Bullet

3019989 – February 6, 1962 – Atmospheric Space Charge Modification

2986360 – May 30, 1962 – Aerial Insecticide Dusting Device

3046168 – July 24, 1962 – Chemically Produced Colored Smokes

3056556 – October 2, 1962 – Method of Artificially Influencing the Weather

3126155 – March 24, 1964 – Silver Iodide Cloud Seeding Generator

3127107 – March 31, 1964 – Generation of Ice-Nucleating Crystals

3131131 – April 28, 1964 – Electrostatic Mixing in Microbial Conversions

3140207 – July 7, 1964 – Pyrotechnic Composition

3174150 – March 16, 1965 – Self-Focusing Antenna System

3234357 – February 8, 1966 – Electrically Heated Smoke Producing Device

3274035 – September 20, 1966 – Metallic Composition For Production of Hydroscopic Smoke

3284005 – November 8,1966 – Weather Control by Artificial Means

3300721 – January 24, 1967 – Means For Communication Through a Layer of Ionized Gases

3313487 – April 11, 1967 – Cloud Seeding Apparatus

3338476 – August 29, 1967 – Heating Device For Use With Aerosol Containers

3375148 – March 26, 1968 – Pyrotechnics Comprising Silver Iodate, Ammonium Nitrate, Nitrocellulose and Nitrate Esters

3378201 – April 16, 1968 – Method for Precipitating Atmospheric Water Masses

3410489 – November 12, 1968 – Automatically Adjustable Airfoil Spray System With Pump

3418184 – December 24, 1968 – Smoke Producing Propellant

3429507 – February 25, 1969 – Rainmaker

3432208 – November 7, 1967 – Fluidized Particle Dispenser

3441214 – April 29, 1969 – Method And Apparatus For Seeding Clouds

3445844 – May 20, 1969 – Trapped Electromagnetic Radiation Communications System

3456880 – July 22, 1969 – Method Of Producing Precipitation From The Atmosphere

3518670 – June 30, 1970 – Artificial Ion Cloud

3517512 – June 30, 1970 – Apparatus for Suppressing Contrails

3534906 – October 20, 1970 – Control of Atmospheric Particles

3545677 – December 8, 1970 – Method of Cloud Seeding

3564253 – February 16, 1971 – System And Method For Irradiation Of Planet Surface Areas

3587966 – June 28, 1971 – Freezing Nucleation

3595477 – July 27, 1971 – Fog Dispersing Method and Compositions

3601312 – August 24, 1971 – Methods of Increasing The Likelihood oF Precipitation By The Artificial Introduction Of Sea Water Vapor Into The Atmosphere Winward Of An Air Lift Region

3608810 – September 28, 1971 – Methods of Treating Atmospheric Conditions

3608820– September 20, 1971 – Treatment of Atmospheric Conditions by Intermittent Dispensing of Materials Therein

3613992 – October 19, 1971 – Weather Modification Method

3630950 – December 28, 1971 – Combustible Compositions For Generating Aerosols, Particularly Suitable For Cloud Modification And Weather Control And Aerosolization Process

USRE29142 – May 22, 1973 – Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process

3659785 – December 8, 1971 – Weather Modification Utilizing Microencapsulated Material

3666176 – March 3, 1972 – Solar Temperature Inversion Device

3677840 – July 18, 1972 – Pyrotechnics Comprising Oxide of Silver For Weather Modification Use

3690552 – September 12, 1972 – Fog Dispersal

3722183 – March 27, 1973 – Device For Clearing Impurities From The Atmosphere

3748278 – July 24, 1973 – Process and Agents Having an Influence on the Weather

3751913 – August 14, 1973 – Barium Release System

3769107 – October 30, 1973 – Pyrotechnic Composition For Generating Lead Based Smoke

3784099 – January 8, 1974 – Air Pollution Control Method

3785557 – January 15, 1974 – Cloud Seeding System

3788543 – January 29, 1974 – Uniform Size Particle Generator

3795626 – March 5, 1974 – Weather Modification Process

3802971 – April 9, 1974 – Pyrotechnic Formulations for Weather Modification Comprising a Mixture of Iodates

3808595 – April 30, 1974 – Chaff Dispensing System

3813875 – June 4, 1974 – Rocket Having Barium Release System to Create Ion Clouds In The Upper Atmosphere

3835059 – September 10, 1974 – Methods of Generating Ice Nuclei Smoke Particles For Weather Modification And Apparatus Therefore

3835293 – September 10, 1974 – Electrical Heating Apparatus For Generating Super Heated Vapors

3858805 – January 7, 1975 – Ice Nucleation by Micas

3877642 – April 15, 1975 – Freezing Nucleant

3882393 – May 6, 1975 – Communications System Utilizing Modulation of The Characteristic Polarization of The Ionosphere

3887580 – June 3, 1975 – Method of Crystallization of Water in Supercooled Clouds and Fogs and Reagent Useful in Said Method

3896993 – July 29, 1975 – Process For Local Modification of Fog And Clouds For Triggering Their Precipitation And For Hindering The Development of Hail Producing Clouds

3899129 – August 12, 1975 – Apparatus for generating ice nuclei smoke particles for weather modification

3899144 – August 12, 1975 – Powder contrail generation

3915379 – October 28, 1975 – Method of Controlling Weather

3940059 – February 24, 1976 – Method For Fog Dispersion

3940060 – February 24, 1976 – Vortex Ring Generator

3990987 – November 9, 1976 – Smoke generator

3992628 – November 16, 1976 – Countermeasure system for laser radiation

3994437 – November 30, 1976 – Broadcast dissemination of trace quantities of biologically active chemicals

4042196 – August 16, 1977 – Method and apparatus for triggering a substantial change in earth characteristics and measuring earth changes

RE29,142 – February 22, 1977 – Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process

4009828 – March 1 1977 – Organic Nucleating Agent for both Warm and Cold Clouds

4035726 – July 12, 1977 – Method of controlling and/or improving high-latitude and other communications or radio wave surveillance systems by partial control of radio wave et al

4096005 – June 20, 1978 – Pyrotechnic Cloud Seeding Composition

4129252 – December 12, 1978 – Method and apparatus for production of seeding materials

4141274 – February 27, 1979 – Weather modification automatic cartridge dispenser

4167008 – September 4, 1979 – Fluid bed chaff dispenser

4347284 – August 31, 1982 – White cover sheet material capable of reflecting ultraviolet rays

4362271 – December 7, 1982 – Procedure for the artificial modification of atmospheric precipitation as well as compounds with a dimethyl sulfoxide base for use in carrying out said procedure

4373391 – February 15, 1983 – Relative Humidity Sensitive Material

4396152 – August 2, 1983 – Aerosol Dispenser System

4402480 – September 6, 1983 – Atmosphere modification satellite

4412654 – November 1, 1983 – Laminar microjet atomizer and method of aerial spraying of liquids

4415265 – November 15, 1983 – Method and apparatus for aerosol particle absorption spectroscopy

4470544 – September 11, 1984 – Method of and Means for weather modification

4475927 – October 9, 1984 – Bipolar Fog Abatement System

4600147 – July 15, 1986 – Liquid propane generator for cloud seeding apparatus

4633714 – January 6, 1987 – Aerosol particle charge and size analyzer

4643355 – February 17, 1987 – Method and apparatus for modification of climatic conditions

4653690 – March 31, 1987 – Method of producing cumulus clouds

4684063 – August 4, 1987 – Particulates generation and removal

4686605 – August 11, 1987 – HAARP Patent / EASTLUND PATENT – Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth’s atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere

4704942 – November 10, 1987 – Charged Aerosol

4712155 – December 8, 1987 – Method and apparatus for creating an artificial electron cyclotron heating region of plasma

4742958 – May 10, 1988 – Method for Making Artificial Snow

4744919 – May 17, 1988 – Method of dispersing particulate aerosol tracer

4766725 – August 30, 1988 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor

4829838 – May 16, 1989 – Method and apparatus for the measurement of the size of particles entrained in a gas

4836086 – June 6, 1989 – Apparatus and method for the mixing and diffusion of warm and cold air for dissolving fog

4873928 – October 17, 1989 – Nuclear-sized explosions without radiation

4948257 – August 14, 1990 – Laser optical measuring device and method for stabilizing fringe pattern spacing

1338343– August 14, 1990 – Process and Apparatus for the production of intense artificial Fog

4999637 – March 12, 1991 – Creation of artificial ionization clouds above the earth

5003186 – March 26, 1991 – Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming

5005355 – April 9, 1991 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor

5038664 – August 13, 1991 – Method for producing a shell of relativistic particles at an altitude above the earths surface

5041760 – August 20, 1991 – Method and apparatus for generating and utilizing a compound plasma configuration

5041834 – August 20, 1991 – Artificial ionospheric mirror composed of a plasma layer which can be tilted

5056357 – October 15, 1991- Acoustic method for measuring properties of a mobile medium

5059909 – October 22, 1991 – Determination of particle size and electrical charge

5104069 – April 14, 1992 – Apparatus and method for ejecting matter from an aircraft

5110502 – May 5, 1992 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor

5156802 – October 20, 1992 – Inspection of fuel particles with acoustics

5174498 – December 29, 1992 – Cloud Seeding

5148173 – September 15, 1992 – Millimeter wave screening cloud and method

5242820 – September 7, 1993 – Army Mycoplasma Patent Patent

5245290 – September 14, 1993 – Device for determining the size and charge of colloidal particles by measuring electroacoustic effect

5286979 – February 15, 1994 – Process for absorbing ultraviolet radiation using dispersed melanin

5296910 – March 22, 1994 – Method and apparatus for particle analysis

5327222 – July 5, 1994 – Displacement information detecting apparatus

5357865 – October 25, 1994 – Method of cloud seeding

5360162 – November 1, 1994 – Method and composition for precipitation of atmospheric water

5383024 – January 17, 1995 – Optical wet steam monitor

5425413 – June 20, 1995 – Method to hinder the formation and to break-up overhead atmospheric inversions, enhance ground level air circulation and improve urban air quality

5434667 – July 18, 1995 – Characterization of particles by modulated dynamic light scattering

5436039 – July 25, 1995 – Artificial Snow in an Aggregate Form of Snow Granules

5441200 – August 15, 1995 – Tropical cyclone disruption

5492274 – February 20, 1996 – Method of and Means for Weather Modification

5546183 – August, 13, 1996 – LIDAR Droplet Size Monitor for In-Flight Measurement of Aircraft Engine Exhaust Contrails, Droplets and Aerosols

5556029 – September 17, 1996 – Method of hydrometeor dissipation (clouds)

5628455 – May 13, 1997 – Method and apparatus for modification of supercooled fog

5631414 – May 20, 1997 – Method and device for remote diagnostics of ocean-atmosphere system state

5639441 – June 17, 1997 – Methods for fine particle formation

5762298 – June 9, 1998 – Use of artificial satellites in earth orbits adaptively to modify the effect that solar radiation would otherwise have on earth’s weather

5800481 – September 1, 1998 – Thermal excitation of sensory resonances

5912396 – June 15, 1999 – System and method for remediation of selected atmospheric conditions

5922976 – July 13, 1999 – Method of measuring aerosol particles using automated mobility-classified aerosol detector

5949001 – September 7, 1999 – Method for aerodynamic particle size analysis

5984239 – November 16, 1999 – Weather modification by artificial satellites

6025402 – February 15, 2000 – Chemical composition for effectuating a reduction of visibility obscuration, and a detoxifixation of fumes and chemical fogs in spaces of fire origin

6030506 – February 29, 2000 – Preparation of independently generated highly reactive chemical species

6034073 – March 7, 2000 – Solvent detergent emulsions having antiviral activity

6045089 – April 4, 2000 – Solar-powered airplane

6056203 – May 2, 2000 – Method and apparatus for modifying supercooled clouds

6315213B1 – June 21, 2000 – Method of modifying weather

6110590 – August 29, 2000 – Synthetically spun silk nanofibers and a process for making the same

6263744 – July 24, 2001 – Automated mobility-classified-aerosol detector

6281972 – August 28, 2001 – Method and apparatus for measuring particle-size distribution

20030085296 – November 2, 2001 – Hurricane and tornado control device

6315213 – November 13, 2001 – Method of modifying weather

2002009338 – January 24, 2002 – Influencing Weather Patterns by way of Altering Surface or Subsurface Ocean Water Temperatures

20020008155 – January 24, 2002 – Method and System for Hurricane Control

6382526 – May 7, 2002 – Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers

6408704 – June 25, 2002 – Aerodynamic particle size analysis method and apparatus

6412416 – July 2, 2002 – Propellant-based aerosol generation devices and method

6520425 – February 18, 2003 – Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers

6539812 – April 1, 2003 – System for measuring the flow-rate of a gas by means of ultrasound

6553849 – April 29, 2003 – Electrodynamic particle size analyzer

6569393 – May 27, 2003 – Method And Device For Cleaning The Atmosphere

20040060994 – April 1, 2004 – Method for Influencing Atmospheric Formations

20040074980 – April 22, 2004 – Method and Device for Generating a Liquid Mist

0056705 A1 – March 17, 2005 – Weather Modification by Royal Rainmaking Technology

6890497 – May 10, 2005 – Method For Extracting And Sequestering Carbon Dioxide

2446250 – January 4, 2007 – A dust or particle-based solar shield to counteract global warming

20070056436 – March 15, 2007 – Challenger to Natural Twisters, Technology

2007033448 – March 29, 2007 – Production of Localized Artificial Rains in Polar Stratospheric Clouds, to Promote a Rain Wash in the CIO Gas, Reduce the Destruction of the Ozone Layer and a Replacement Process in situ of the Stratospheric Ozone

20070114298 – May 24, 2007 – Hurricane Abatement Method and System

20070158449 – July 12, 2007- Tropical Hurricane Control System

20070215946 – September 20, 2007 – Broadband Communications System via Reflection from Artificial Ionized Plasma Patterns in the Atmosphere

7965488 – November 9, 2007 – Methods Of Removing Aerosols From The Atmosphere

8048309 – August 28, 2008 – Seawater-Based Carbon Dioxide Disposal

20080203328 – August 28, 2008 – Outer Space Sun Screen for Reducing Global Warming

20100072297 – September 24, 2008 – Method for controlling hurricanes

7434524 – October 14, 2008 – Machine to Get Rid of Hurricanes

8012453 – October 27, 2008 – Carbon Sequestration And Production Of Hydrogen And Hydride

20090008468 – January 8, 2009 – How to Tame Hurricanes and Typhoons with Available Technology

7520237 – April 21, 2009 – Hurricane Prevention System and Method

20090255999 – October 15, 2009 – Production or Distribution of Radiative Forcing Elements

20090290761 – November 26, 2009 – Upper Troposphere and Lower Stratosphere Wind Direction, Speed, and Turbidity Monitoring using Digital Imaging and Motion Tracking

7645326 – January 12, 2010 – RFID environmental manipulation

7655193 – February 2, 2010 – Apparatus For Extracting And Sequestering Carbon Dioxide

20100074390 – March 25, 2010 – Method for Weather Modification and Vapor Generator for Weather Modification

20100127224 – May 27, 2010 – Atmospheric Injection of Reflective Aerosol for Mitigating Global Warming

7748662 – July 6, 2010 – Aerial Delivery System

20100170958 – July 8, 2010 – Hurricane Mitigation by Combined Seeding with Condensation and Freezing Nuclei

20100252648 – October 7, 2010 – Climate Processor

20100264230 – October 21, 2010 – Severe Storm / Hurricane Modification Method and Apparatus

20100282914 – November 11, 2010 – Enhanced Aerial Delivery System

20110005422 – January 13, 2011 – Method and Apparatus for Cooling a Planet

20110049257 – March 3, 2011 – Method and Apparatus for Local Modification of Atmosphere

20110101124 – May 5, 2011- Hurricane Abatement System and Method

2011073650 – June 23, 2011 – Atmospheric Delivery System

20110168797 – July 14, 2011 – Method of Weakening a Hurricane

20110174892 – July 21, 2011 – Apparatus and Related Methods for Weather Modification by Electrical Processes in the Atmosphere

20110198407 – August 18, 2011 – Method and Apparatus to Break Up or Annihilate Typhoons, Tornadoes, Cyclones or Hurricanes

20110204159 – August 25, 2011 – Weather Management Using Space-Based Power System

20110284649 – November 24, 2011 – Apparatus and Method for the Mitigation of Rotating Wind Storms

8079545 – December 20, 2011 – Ground based Manipulation and Control of Aerial Vehicle during nonflying operations

20120024971 – February 2, 2012 – Methods for Environmental Modification with Climate Control Materials and Coverings

8262314 – September 11, 2012 – Method for Decreasing the Intensity and Frequency of Tropical Storms or Hurricanes

0117003 – October 5, 2012 – Geoengineering Method Of Business Using Carbon Counterbalance Credits

20120267444 – October 25, 2012- Artificial Freezing Apparatus and Freezing Method Therefor

20120286096 – November 15, 2012 – Aerial Delivery Devices, Systems and Methods

20130008365 – January 10, 2013 – System and Method for Decreasing the Intensity and Frequency of Tropical Storms or Hurricanes

20130015260 – January 17, 2013 – Concept and Model for Utilizing High-Frequency or Radar or Microwave Producing or Emitting Devices to Produce, Effect, Create or Induce Lightning or Lightspeed or Visible to Naked Eye Electromagnetic Pulse or Pulses, Acoustic or Ultrasonic Shockwaves or Booms in the Air, Space, Enclosed, or Upon any Object or Mass, to be Used Solely or as Part of a System, Platform or Device Including Weaponry and Weather Modification

8373962 – February 12, 2013 – Charged seed cloud as a method for increasing particle collisions and for scavenging airborne biological agents and other contaminants

20130038063 – February 14, 2013 – Apparatus and Method for Inhibiting the Formation of Tropical Cyclones

201300043322 – February 21, 2013 – Processes and Apparatus for Reducing the Intensity of Tropical Cyclones

8402736 – March 26, 2013 – Method and Apparatus for Suppressing Aeroengine Contrails

8439278 – May 14, 2013 – Apparatus for Producing a Mass of Water Vapor, Apparatus for Producing, Moving, and Climbing a Mass of Water Vapor, and Method of Causing Artificial Stimulation of Rain

20130175352 – July 11, 2013 – Method to Influence the Direction of Travel of Hurricanes

20130186127 – July 25, 2013 – Ice Floater for Facilitating Ice-Freezing on Water Surface

20130206912 – August 15, 2013 – Moisture Dispersion

20140055876 – February 27, 2014 – Method for Controlling Land Surface Temperature using Stratospheric Airships and Reflector

20140131471 – May 15, 2014 – Apparatus to Channel Large Air Masses for Climate Modification

20140145002 – May 29, 2014 – System for Facilitating Cloud Formation and Cloud Precipitation

20140224894 – August 14, 2014 – Technique to Mitigate Storms using Arrays of Wind Turbines

8825241 – September 2, 2014 – Autonomous Wave-Powered substance Distribution Vessels for Fertilizing Plankton, Feeding Fish, and Sequestering Carbon from the Atmosphere

8944363 – February 3, 2015 – Production or Distribution of Radiative Forcing Agents

20150077737 – March 19 2015 – System and Methods for Monitoring an Environment

9002660 – April 7, 2015 – Device and Method for Determining and Indicating Climate-Relevant Effects of a Contrail Produced by an Airplane

20150230415 – August 20, 2015 – Methods for Decreasing Local Temperature using High Albedo Materials

20150337224 – November 26, 2015 – Microwave Acceleration of Carbon Gasification Reactions

9311539 – April 12, 2016 – Aircraft Contrail Detection

9429348 – August 30, 2016 – Method and Device for Producing Snow

9491911 – November 15, 2016 – Method for Modifying Environmental Conditions with Ring Comprised of Magnetic Material

9589473 – March 7, 2017 – Method and System for Automatically Displaying Flight Path, Seeding Path, and Weather Data

9715039 – July 25, 2017 – Apparatus and System for Smart Seeding within Cloud Formations

20170217587 – August 3, 2017 – Vehicles and Systems for Weather Modification

20170303479 – October 26, 2017 – Warm Cloud Catalyst, Preparation Method Therefor and Application Thereof

20180006422 – January 4, 2018 – Methods for Disrupting Hurricane Activity

20180006421 – January 4, 2018 – Methods for Disrupting Tornadic Activity

9924640 – March 27, 2018 – Modifying Sunlight Scatter in the Upper Atmosphere

20180217119 – August 2, 2018 – Process and Method for the Enhancement of Sequestering Atmospheric Carbon through Ocean Iron Fertilization, and Method for Calculating net Carbon Capture from said Process and Method

10189753 – January 29, 2019 – Fog-Generating Device Comprising a Reagent and Ignition Means

2019203461 – June 6, 2019 – Airships for Weather Manipulation

10314249 – June 11, 2019 – Systems and Methods of Inducing Rainfall

10375900 – August 13, 2019 – Rain Induced by Supercontinuum Laser Beams

10433408 – October 1, 2019 – Methods for Affecting Spinning Atmospheric Phenomena

10435165 – October 8, 2019 – Aircraft Electrically-Assisted Propulsion Control System

20190364748 – December 5, 2019 – Method and System for Expressing Airborne Cloud Seeding Line Considering Cloud Water

20200187430 – June 18, 2020 – Helical Artificial Generator of Tornado, Hurricane, Yellow Dust, and Typhoon

20200196539 – June 25, 2020 – Device for Seeding a Cloud Cell

10701871 – July 7, 2020 – Systems for Maintaining and/or Decreasing Water Temperature using High Albedo Materials

20200233115 – July 23, 2020 – Method and System for Determining Cloud Seeding Potential

WO2020148644A1 – July 23, 2020 – 3d Reduced Graphene Oxide/Sio 2 Composite for Ice Nucleation

20200261939 – August 20, 2020 – Apparatus for Generating and Optically Characterizing an Aerosol

2020101897 – September 9, 2020 – Artificial Rainmaking by High Power Laser Initiation Endothermic Reactions through Drone Aircraft Remote Control System

20200288650 – September 17, 2020 – Technology and Technique to Prevent, Diminish or Interfere with the Formation of Hurricanes on Earth from one or more Platforms in Space

20200288651 – September 17, 2020 – Methods for Cooling Water Temperature using High Albedo Materials

20200315104 – October 8, 2020 – Propagating Sound Through Bodies of Water, to Generate and Direct Wind, for the Purpose of Moderating and Affecting Weather Patterns

20200386970 – December 10, 2020 – Aerostatically Stabilized Atmospheric Reflector to Reduce Solar Irradiance

10888051 – January 12, 2021 – Intelligent Systems for Weather Modification Programs

20210037719 – February 11, 2021 – Planetary Weather Modification System

10941705 – March 9, 2021 – Hanson-Haber Aircraft Engine for the Production of Stratospheric Compounds and for the Creation of Atmospheric Reflectivity of Solar Radiation in the 555nm Range and to Increase Jet Engine Thrust and Fuel Economy through the Combustion of Ammonia and Ammonia By-Products

2021063943 – April 8, 2021 – Bacterial Preparations for Ice Nucleation

20210153442 – May 27, 2021 – Systems and Methods for Rain Cloud Initiation

20210163157 – June 3, 2021 – Artificial Ring, Solenoid System to Terraform

20210235638 – August 5, 2021 – Weather Management of Cyclonic Events

2021152336 – August 8, 2021 – Method of Cloud Seeding using Natural Ice Nucleating Agents

20210285851 – September 16, 2021- System for Sampling and Analyzing Contrails Generated by an Aircraft

20210289720 – September 23, 2021 – Systems and Methods for Producing Rain Clouds

2021105881 – October 21, 2021 – Process for Generating Marine Clouds and Ocean Microbubbles

20210329922 – October 28, 2021 – Compositions and Methods for Enhanced CO2 Capture and Storage

20210329852 – October 28, 2021 – Method for Preventing a Formation of, and/or for Dispersing, a Tropical Cyclone, and Arrangement Therefor

20210352856 – November 18, 2021 – Aerial Electrostatic System for Weather Modification

2021107294 – December 9, 2021 – Wind Turbines for Marine Cloud Brightening Dispersion

2022003028 – January 6, 2022 – Apparatus for Precipitation of Atmospheric Water

23220065599 – March 3, 2022 – Rocket for Artificial Rainfall using Ejection Hygroscopic Flare

11274534 – March 15, 2022 – Artificial rain to support water flooding in remote oil fields

20220113450 – April 14, 2022 – Calculation Method of Total Artificial Precipitation in Seeding Area Compared to Non-Seeding Area

2022094269 – May 5, 2022 – Reflective Hollow SRM Material and Methods

3994976 – May 11, 2022 – Apparatus for Electro-Spray Cloud Seeding

11330768 – May 17, 2022 – Systems and Methods for Producing Rain Clouds

20220268505 – August 25, 2022 – Method and Apparatus for Making Falling Snow

2022186970 – September 9, 2022 – Method of Geoengineering to Reduce Solar Radiation

20220355925 – November 10, 2022 – Aeronautical Car and Associated Features

20220357482 – November 10, 2022 – Method and System of Analyzing Ingredients of Artificial Rainfall for Verification of Cloud Seeding Effect

20230050373 – February 16, 2023 – Electromagnetic System to Modify Weather

20230075132 – March 9, 2023 – System for Moderating Energy Absorption at the Earth’s Surface with a Programmable Forcing Network of Climate Control Panels

20230117390 – April 20, 2023 – System and Method for Proactive and Reversible Mitigation of Storm/Hurricane/Typhoon/Cyclone

20230126982 – April 27, 2023 – Method for Analyzing Effect of Hygroscopic Seeding Material Sprayed on Ground Aerosol Concentration Through Airborne Cloud Seeding Experiment

20230141493 – May 11, 2023 – Device for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle to Deploy a Rainfall Catalytic Bomb

20230149876 – May 18, 2023 – Coated Chloride Salt Particles and Methods of Making and Using the Same

I don’t understand why you have to pay to live on a planet you were born on.

And then, I mean, it’s such a simple question and it’s haunted me ever since.

And you know what, ladies and gentlemen?

Ask yourself that question.

Why do we have to pay to live on a planet we were born on?

And who are we actually paying for the privilege of being alive here?

Who made them the boss?

Who put them in charge?

You know?

Think about that.

We’re looking at a war over water.

When instead of feeding the military industrial complex,

we could be building desalination plants all over the world.

So everybody could have water.

So they could grow crops.

But are we doing it?

Hell no.

Why would we want to do that?

Why would we want to empower people to grow food and take care of themselves?

Then we can’t control them.

This is what I’m talking about.

What can you expect? You’ll find captivating interviews with individuals passionately committed to exposing hidden truths. Each chapter combines informative text with direct access to multimedia: links and QR codes guide you to related videos and additional resources. In addition to the original texts, this booklet offers countless references to valuable resources, including links and patents related to chemtrails and weather manipulation.

All interviews and texts are compiled by Kla.TV and Ivo Sasek. Independently, but with full permission, we present this material in book form to inform a wider audience about the hidden truths and deceptions surrounding us.
With this compact booklet, you’ll have a powerful tool to explore the world in a new way and take action.

Language: English

Paperback

Format: 110 x 180mm

Black/White print

Pages: 131

ISBN: 9789403819167

ORDER